

TaskJustice (1000 best lawyers): The Global Legal Force to Sue Polluters and Defend the Future of Coastal Cities. The contradiction between coastal real estate income and capital from oil, in the context of the acceleration of global warming, has important economic, environmental, and legal implications.
LAW FIRMS WITH EXPERTISE IN INTERNATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, WITHOUT DIRECT LINK TO EMC. OUR TASKSELLER OF ONE THOUSAND HUMAN OPERATIVES, EXPANDABLE TO + 10,000 IN THE COMING MONTHS, TRANSFERS THE CLAIMS TO THOSE INTERESTED IN REPRESENTING THOSE AFFECTED BY THE CATASTROPHIC EFFECTS OF GLOBAL POLLUTION CAUSED BY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COUNTRIES AND COMPANIES. IF AN ENTIRE ISLAND COASTAL CITY, SUCH AS THE MALDIVES, SUES, THE LAWSUIT CAN ESCALATE INTO THE TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. LAWYERS CHARGE FEES FROM A FLOOR OF 20%…













TaskJustice: The Global Legal Force to Sue Polluters and Defend the Future of Coastal Cities
The contradiction between coastal real estate income and capital from oil, in the context of the acceleration of global warming, has important economic, environmental, and legal implications. Below is a detailed analysis:
1. Contradiction between Real Estate Income and Oil Capital
- Coastal Real Estate: Properties in coastal areas are highly valued due to their proximity to the sea and their tourism and recreational benefits. However, rising sea levels, primarily caused by global warming due to the use of fossil fuels, put these properties at risk. As flooding, intense storms, and coastal erosion worsen, the value of these real estate assets decreases. Coastal cities risk losing billions of dollars in property value.
- Oil Capital: Oil and gas companies, being some of the main contributors to global warming, continue to generate enormous short-term profits. However, this same capital stems from activities that, in the long run, contribute to the destruction of coastal property value and economic losses due to the climate crisis.
2. Impact Assessment
- Economic: In the case of a coastal city with a population of one million becoming uninhabitable or losing property value due to rising sea levels, economic losses can range from $20 billion to $100 billion. Law firms could claim a significant portion of these losses, with commissions up to 20% of the amounts claimed.

- Legal: Legal actions, such as recent lawsuits against France and Switzerland, demonstrate that cities and nations affected by climate change can hold major polluters—countries and companies—responsible for their actions. This opens the door for affected coastal cities to file global lawsuits, claiming significant compensation for the losses suffered.
3. Optimization of the Legal Process
- GreenInterbanks: Acting as an intermediary, this system channels complaints against polluting countries and companies to law firms specializing in environmental law. With a 20% commission on the cases it provides, GreenInterbanks facilitates accessibility for organizations and citizens to carry out these lawsuits, avoiding monopolies in legal services and ensuring transparency in the process.
- Profit Structure: 70% of the gross profits generated are allocated to Mayday.live to support humanitarian aid initiatives and actions against global warming, such as massive reforestation. 10% covers GreenInterbanks’ operating costs, while the remaining 20% is distributed among lawyers and account executives associated with the system.
4. Legal Principles Description
- Precautionary Principle (Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration): This principle states that countries should apply a precautionary approach when there is a risk of serious or irreversible environmental damage, even if there is no absolute scientific certainty. This is the key argument in lawsuits against countries and companies that continue to emit large amounts of greenhouse gases.

- Polluter Pays Principle (Principle 16): This principle asserts that polluters must bear the costs of their actions. Applying this principle globally means that polluting countries and companies must cover the costs of repair and compensation measures for damages, both to coastal cities and other regions affected by climate change.
- Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (Principle 7): Developed countries, being the largest historical emitters, have a greater responsibility in mitigating climate change. International litigation can rely on this principle to demand greater financial and technological contributions from these countries.
5. Access to Information and Participation (Principle 10)
This principle guarantees that citizens have access to information about polluting activities and can participate in environmental decision-making processes. In this context, GreenInterbanks facilitates access to justice by connecting affected citizens and organizations with law firms that can effectively manage their claims.
6. Optimization of the Global Legal System
To ensure an efficient and fair process in global lawsuits against major polluters, it is crucial to:
- Create an international arbitration mechanism to centralize claims from multiple countries and cities, avoiding fragmentation and ensuring legal agreements are respected.
- Coordinate massive legal actions involving all affected coastal cities and island nations, presenting joint claims to increase bargaining power.
- Foster international alliances among law firms specializing in environmental law, so they can collaborate on these cases and share successful experiences and strategies.

7. Conclusion
The contradiction between coastal real estate income and oil capital reflects a direct struggle between short and long-term interests: while fossil fuel companies continue to generate profits at the expense of the environment, coastal cities face the imminent loss of their income and properties due to climate change. The GreenInterbanks system, combined with the environmental justice principles of the Rio Declaration, can serve as an effective tool to mobilize legal action and hold polluters accountable. Ultimately, success will depend on global coordination and the implementation of efficient legal strategies.
The TaskJustice system is activated by an initial staff of 1,000 «tasksellers,» expandable to 10,000, depending on demand and the magnitude of the cases. These «tasksellers» are responsible for identifying and connecting clients with law firms specialized in pollution claims. The system is designed to be highly scalable, as commissions for acquiring clients can be significantly high, especially in the case of collective claims involving entire coastal cities affected by rising sea levels. If a large-scale lawsuit is won, such as for a coastal city with one million inhabitants, commissions can range between $500 million and $500 million, depending on the compensation value obtained.
This approach ensures that TaskJustice not only expands its operational capacity but also its ability to generate revenue and ensure a high impact on climate change-related litigation.





















Ecobuddha Maitreya Corp Global Financial Logistics: Quantum Digital Assets
Art agent, contact: robotagency.live@gmail.com
Copyright © 2024



