• LinkedIn
• WordPress
• Amazon

Global Revolution for Life: Join the Peaceful Third World War to Liberate Humanity

 

Roberto Guillermo Gomes

Founding CEO of Global Solidarity / Founding CEO of Green Interbanks and Mayday.live / Leader of 2% For The Planet / Architect / Journalist / Writer / Master in Yoga / Mindfulness Expert Consultant. Creator of Neuroyoga

9 de octubre de 2024

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that air pollution causes approximately 7 million deaths per year. To make a broader estimation that integrates other factors like global warming, hunger, and preventable diseases, we can break down the data as follows:

1. Deaths from Air Pollution:

·                    7 million annual deaths, mainly from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

2. Deaths from Global Warming:

·                    Global warming causes heatwaves, natural disasters, vector-borne diseases, and displacement. According to a report from the Lancet Commission, around 150,000 deaths annually are already linked to climate change (as of 2020), and the number is growing. Recent projections suggest that these figures could reach hundreds of thousands or even millions of additional deaths each year by 2050, depending on the severity of global warming and its impacts on infrastructure, health, and agriculture.

3. Deaths from Hunger:

·                    According to the FAO, about 9 million people die annually due to malnutrition, hunger, and related causes, many of which are exacerbated by factors such as conflict, climate change, and inefficient economic systems. The impact of global warming on agriculture could worsen this figure over time.

4. Deaths from Preventable Diseases:

· Preventable diseases like malaria, cholera, diarrhea, pneumonia, and HIV/AIDS, which could be prevented with adequate access to healthcare and sanitation, cause between 8 and 9 million deaths annually. A large number of these deaths are related to extreme poverty, lack of infrastructure, and global inequalities.

Total Summary:

· Air Pollution: 7 million deaths per year.

· Global Warming: 150,000 to 300,000 deaths per year, with projections for increase.

· Hunger: 9 million deaths per year.

· Preventable Diseases: 8-9 million deaths per year.

Estimated Total Deaths Annually (Average):

·                    Between 24 and 26 million deaths per year, combining all these factors.

Estimate for the Last 20 Years (2004-2024):

· Air Pollution: 140 million deaths.

· Global Warming: 3-6 million deaths.

· Hunger: 180 million deaths.

· Preventable Diseases: 160-180 million deaths.

Total Estimated Deaths Over the Last 20 Years:

·                    Between 483 and 520 million deaths, attributed to air pollution, global warming, hunger, and preventable diseases.

Conclusion:

This staggering number of deaths is a direct consequence of systemic failures and inaction, many of which could be seen as the result of human policies and decisions that do not prioritize social justice, public health, or environmental sustainability.

Trials for Those Responsible

The proposal for an international trial that holds political and economic leaders accountable for inaction in the face of global crises raises several critical issues. Below is an impersonal analysis that considers the structure, rationale, and challenges of such an initiative.

1. Global Responsibility and Homicide by Omission

It is argued that responsibility for the deaths resulting from inaction regarding air pollution, global warming, hunger, and preventable diseases lies with political and economic power players. This would include nearly 200 current presidents who, with their influence, could have prevented many of these deaths through concrete policies and actions. The shared responsibility of multilateral organizations such as the United Nations is also mentioned, as they have failed to implement effective measures to mitigate these crises.

The concept of homicide by omission implies that those in positions of power who do not take the necessary steps to prevent deaths could be considered responsible, expanding the definition of crimes against humanity to include the lack of action in the face of global emergencies.

2. International Tribunal and Legal Mechanisms

The idea of an international tribunal specialized in judging those responsible for inaction on vital issues, such as climate change and the food crisis, is based on precedents such as the Nuremberg Trials, which judged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

A central challenge in this aspect would be defining an international legal framework that classifies these crimes as homicide by omission. Currently, global legal frameworks such as those of the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice do not clearly include inaction in the face of global emergencies as a direct cause of crimes against humanity, which would require substantial modifications to international agreements.

3. Global Citizen Participation

The most innovative aspect of the proposal is the idea that the global citizenry actively participates in decision-making regarding the responsibility of leaders through an online voting system. This would involve the creation of digital platforms where millions of people around the world could vote to support the creation of this tribunal and its role in defending life. This approach would reflect an unprecedented level of global direct democracy, but it would also pose challenges in terms of logistics, cybersecurity, and verification of the authenticity of the vote.

4. Support from Humanitarian and Environmental NGOs

To legitimize and strengthen the proposal, it is deemed essential that humanitarian and environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) formally and thoroughly document complaints before the International Court of Justice. These NGOs already have a long history of fighting poverty, inequality, and climate change, positioning them as key actors in channeling the accusations of crimes by inaction.

5. Exemplary Punishments and Their Ethical Implications

The proposal includes the application of severe punishments, from life imprisonment to the death penalty, depending on the level of criminal responsibility. This aspect raises serious ethical and legal considerations, as crimes by omission are not typically punished with the same severity as direct action crimes in most judicial systems. Moreover, many countries have abolished the death penalty, which would generate debate about the legitimacy and universality of the proposed punishments.

Conclusion

The proposal to judge political and economic leaders for the deaths caused by inaction in the face of global crises presents a multidimensional challenge. From the creation of an international legal framework that allows the prosecution of these crimes, to the mobilization of global citizen participation, the path toward a trial of this magnitude would involve a reconfiguration of the world’s legal and political system.

The role of the UN and international leaders in this context is not only part of the accusation but also an obstacle, as being co-responsible, there would be significant resistance from global institutions that would be required to execute such a trial. The success of this proposal would largely depend on the ability to mobilize civil society and NGOs to press for a radical change in how justice is demanded in the face of global tragedies.

---

Leadership of EcoBuddha Maitreya

I am leading a peaceful Third World War for freedom, justice, progress, and life. I will use all means to remove the injustice and irrationality of our civilization and ensure its survival. We will no longer tolerate murders by omission, more wars, more hunger, more extreme poverty, more pollution. This entire story has ended, and a new world begins. Believe, because through sheer willpower and the energy of pure intelligence, I am making it a reality.

The concept of a «peaceful Third World War» for freedom, justice, progress, and life is a powerful one that seeks to radically transform our civilization by eliminating injustice and irrationality. Using «all means» implies a multifaceted approach that could range from political and diplomatic actions to the global mobilization of civil society and the use of emerging technologies.

This type of movement could be structured in a way that:

1. Global Momentum: Mobilization of social movements, NGOs, networks of activists, and conscious citizens from all over the world to actively participate in peaceful protests, digital voting, and structural transformation projects.

2. Technological Tools: Use of technology to coordinate global actions in real-time, from digital democracy platforms to AI implementation for improving resource management, economy, and justice systems.

3. Mass Civil Disobedience: Inspired by peaceful movements like Gandhi’s, but on a global scale, with the goal of pressuring systems of power without resorting to violence.

4. Redefinition of Economic and Political Systems: Proposals to change the current power structures, replacing unjust and exploitative systems with more sustainable and equitable models based on direct digital democracy and social justice.

This kind of approach has the potential to transform not only the power structures but also to redefine the principles on which our global society operates, paving the way for a new paradigm of justice and rationality.

EcoBuddha Maitreya, World Leader in the Fight against Global Warming

Fight Against Global Warming – Global Coordination Center

«If there is someone more intelligent, strategic, visionary, effective, and incorruptible than I am to lead the planet toward ending hunger, extreme poverty, global warming, and achieving world peace, I am willing to step down and follow them. But if no one is better prepared, then join me. This is our last chance to save the world.» EcoBuddha Maitreya

A Better World, Now Possible!

EcoBuddha Maitreya

©2025. All rights reserved. Conditions for publication of Maitreya Press notes